From my earlier post against diversification, let me take
time to address the flawed logic people have about diversification which is
captured well in Jordan, Miller and Dolvin book on Valuation and Management.
Has anyone ever told you “ You’re young, so you should have
a large amount of equity in your portfolio?
I know some of the people I coached during my early days of the
Investment Coaching would say, Yes Patrick, you told me that. Well, while this
advice could be true, the argument frequently used to support the strategy is
generally incorrect. People say, although stocks are more volatile in any given
year, over time this volatility cancels itself out. Investment professionals
say this is a flawed argument. And they refer to the phenomenon as time
diversification fallacy.
Jordan, Miller and Dolvin helped with this line of
reasoning. You might remember from your statistics class that we can add variances together. The fact means that
annual variance grows each year by multiplying annual variance by the number of
years. Standard deviations (SD) cannot be added together because the SD is the
square root of the variance, however, an annual SD grows each year by the
square roots of the number of years.
This feature is very handy when we are describing the returns and risk
of an investment. For example, If we take a randomly selected portfolio of
large –cap stocks of standard deviation of about 20%, and hold this portfolio
for 16 years, the SD would be about 80%, which is 20% multiplied by the square
root of 16.
So, should younger investors put more money into equity? Probably YES, but for a more logical reason
other than the reasoning underlying the fallacy of time diversification.
It is advised by professionals that, if you are young and
your portfolio suffers a steep decline in a particular year, you should make up
for this loss by changing your work habits / job / source of income or getting
a second source of income. People
approaching retirement have little future earning power hence a major loss will
have larger impact on their wealth no wonder the young should rather consider
more equity.

No comments:
Post a Comment